Mark Rubinstein Blog

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Books
    • Mad Dog House
    • Love Gone Mad
    • The Foot Soldier
    • Mad Dog Justice
    • Return to Sandara
    • The Lovers’ Tango
  • Meet Mark
  • FAQS
  • News & Reviews
  • Media Room
  • Blog
  • Book Clubs
    • Mad Dog House Reading Group Guide
    • Love Gone Mad Reading Group Guide
    • The Foot Soldier Reading Group Guide
    • Mad Dog Justice Reading Group Guide
    • The Lovers’ Tango Reading Group Guide
  • Contact

‘Wilde Lake,’ A Conversation with Laura Lippman

June 16, 2016 by Mark Rubinstein Leave a Comment

Laura Lippman began writing novels while working as a reporter. Seven “Tess Monaghan” books were published bLauraLippman Credit, Lesley Unruhefore she left journalism in 2001.  Her bestselling novels, which are considered to be literary crime fiction, have garnered the Edgar, the Anthony, the Agatha, and the Shamus Awards, among other honors.

In Wilde Lake, Luisa “Lu” Brant has just been elected State’s Attorney of Howard County, Maryland, a position previously held by her father. After Lu’s husband dies suddenly, she and her two children move into her childhood home where her father is living.

Despite being independently wealthy, Lu needs to work and takes on the prosecution of Rudy Drysdale, a homeless man accused of murdering a woman in her apartment. While preparing for trial and living in the home where she grew up, memories re-emerge concerning the murder for which her brother was investigated when he was 18 and she was 10.

Lu now begins to question various incidents from 30 years ago, and wonders if memories of her earlier family life are truthful.

Lu Brant is a fascinating character. Tell us a bit about her.

She’s extremely competitive; loves what she does; works despite not having a financial need to do so; and she’s not unlike me in some respects. She’s also someone who’s very aware of following in her father’s footsteps, and can’t help wanting to best her older brother who’s always excelled at everything.

Wilde Lake seems as much a family saga as a crime thriller or mystery.  Will you talk about that?

I define crime novels very broadly. To me, a crime novel is one in which a crime propels the story. There would be no story in Wilde Lake if not for two crimes—the murder of a woman in her apartment in 2015, and an event of 1980 in which there’s a stabbing death.

Sometimes, these genre definitions can trip us up. If a reader comes to Wilde Lake thinking it’s a legal thriller with a case playing out in the courtroom featuring dramatic turns and twists, that person will be disappointed.

Wilde Lake is very much a novel about family and reconciling how we view the past with our present sensibilities. In the present, we often feel superior, as though we’ve figured everything out in the ten or twenty years that have elapsed since something occurred. We tend to forget that if we go into the future and look back at our past—which is our present right now—people might consider us as having been backward or wanting. That should make us a little more forgiving of the mistakes made by our ancestors.

A central element of Wilde Lake is the unreliability of our earlier memories, which create our own version of the truth. Will you talk about that?

Everyone has had the experience of looking back at something from the past and suddenly realizing what really happened. We end up saying, ‘This is what truly happened. This is the perspective I didn’t have as a child.’

Memory isn’t reliable. Telling a story over and over again doesn’t make it any more factual. There’s evidence in the study of the human brain that every time you tell a story, you introduce errors into that story. It’s like lifting a very old piece of lace from a box where it’s been kept. Every time you pick it up, you risk damaging or changing it.

But memory is often the only thing we have. After all, other than factually verifiable incidents, what can we really ‘know’ about past events? If we limit ourselves to primary documents, videos and photographic evidence, we won’t know very much. In journalism and other forms of communication, we have to rely on people’s memories which are almost universally imperfect.

In Wilde Lake, Howard County itself almost seems like a character. Talk about the importance of setting for a novel.

As a writer, place is always very important to me. It’s informative. In Wilde Lake, I wanted to tell a story about well-intentioned people who make mistakes. 1970s Howard County was a perfect place for this story because the town of Columbia—as described in the novel—was founded in 1967 as a kind of utopia. It was a carefully planned community where neighborhoods were as heterogeneous as possible, with small apartments and suburban homes, where different classes and races of people could live side-by-side. The founding principles made the town a perfect “fit” for the story I wanted to tell.

As a highly successful novelist, what’s the most important lesson you’ve learned about writing?

To do it. [Laughter] To get up and write, and to do it regularly. I think people make a mistake in talking about developing discipline. Discipline is a scary word. It doesn’t sound like fun, and it’s difficult to maintain. It’s the conscious act of overcoming one’s own will—like following a diet or exercise program—which almost always fails.

What really works for people isn’t discipline, but habit. It’s crucial to develop the habit of writing. It’s best to start small. My big mistake when I started was trying to write all weekend. It was impossible—it was exhausting and there were other things I needed or wanted to do.

Instead, setting a goal of writing for thirty minutes a day, four times a week, is more realistic. My writing goal to this day is to write a thousand words a day. If I do that five days a week, in twenty weeks I’ll have a novel. That’s the important lesson I’ve learned—to build writing into becoming a habit.

What do you love most about the writing life?

I love working for myself. I have a great editor whom I love, but I really work for myself. I set my own hours; have my own goals; I come up with my own ideas; and I’m treated as a full partner in the enterprise. It’s very different from the newspaper work I once did. I love the independence of being a writer.

You’re hosting a dinner party and can invite any five people from any walk of life, living or dead, fictional or real. Who would they be?

I’d definitely invite Stephen Sondheim. I’d love to have Ferran Adrià, the chef from el Bulli; he is one of the seminal figures in the world of cooking. My husband would be there because I love him, and he’s great company. I would also invite a friend who’s the most provocative, no-holds-barred person I know, Rebecca Chance; and I’d love to invite Michelle Obama to the dinner. I wouldn’t invite any dead people because I’d have to spend so much time bringing them up to speed on stuff. Imagine saying to Shakespeare, ‘The other day, I Googled someone…’ and he would look at me like I’m insane [Laugher].

What’s coming next from Laura Lippman?

The working title is Pink Lady which repurposes and reimagines two novels: The Postman Always Rings Twice by James Cain and Ladder of Years by Anne Tyler.

Congratulations on penning Wilde Lake, a beautifully written novel exploring what happens when we are forced to examine family-shaping myths and the frailty of our most cherished memories.

Please share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on Pinterest

Filed Under: About Books, crime, Huffington Post Column Tagged With: crime, novel, setting, writing discipline

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Connect:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on GoodreadsFollow Us on Scribd

Recent Posts

  • Adrian McKinty Had Given Up On Writing: A Late Night Phone Call Changed Everything
  • David Morrell: Finding Inspiration, Transcending Genres, and Going the Distance
  • Don Winslow and the Making of a Drug War Epic
  • My talk with Lee Child about his “contract” with readers
  • C.J. Box on the Modern Western & Crime Thrillers

Archives

  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012

Categories

  • About Books
  • Aging
  • Awards
  • book launch
  • bookstores
  • courtroom drama
  • creativity
  • crime
  • doctor
  • Dog Tales
  • health
  • Huffington Post Column
  • Interviews
  • library
  • Love Gone Mad
  • Mark Rubinstein
  • medial thriller
  • novel
  • On Writing
  • Podcast
  • psychological thriller
  • Psychology Today Columns
  • Reviews
  • The Foot Soldier
  • thriller
  • Uncategorized
  • war

Copyright © 2015 Mark Rubinstein