Mark Rubinstein Blog

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Books
    • Mad Dog House
    • Love Gone Mad
    • The Foot Soldier
    • Mad Dog Justice
    • Return to Sandara
    • The Lovers’ Tango
  • Meet Mark
  • FAQS
  • News & Reviews
  • Media Room
  • Blog
  • Book Clubs
    • Mad Dog House Reading Group Guide
    • Love Gone Mad Reading Group Guide
    • The Foot Soldier Reading Group Guide
    • Mad Dog Justice Reading Group Guide
    • The Lovers’ Tango Reading Group Guide
  • Contact

Archives for March 2018

Jonathan Kellerman and the Dark Psychology of Crime Fiction

March 21, 2018 by Mark Rubinstein Leave a Comment

Jonathan Kellerman, the bestselling author of more than forty crime novels, is known to mystery-lovers everywhere. With a doctorate in psychology, Jonathan has applied his knowledge not only to his novels, but to those he has co-written with his wife Faye, and son, Jesse. All three are bestselling authors. He has also written children’s and nonfiction books.

He’s won the Goldwyn, Edgar, and Anthony Awards, and has been nominated for a Shamus Award. Along with the late Sue Grafton’s “Alphabet series,” Jonathan’s acclaimed Alex Delaware series is one of the longest running on the literary landscape.

Jonathan’s latest novel, Night Moves, opens with a baffling situation. How and why does the faceless, handless body of a murdered man wind up in the home of a suburban family? The man clearly was killed elsewhere; there’s no sign of blood or violence found in the house. Alex Delaware and his detective partner, Milo Sturgis, must deal with a horrified family.

Soon, another murder occurs, and it’s clear this suburban enclave has plenty of suspicious characters, secrets, and deceit. The novel becomes a taut police procedural as Alex and Milo sift through a tangled web of greed, betrayal, and treachery.

The dialogue in Night Moves is crisp and realistic. Talk to us about dialogue.

I learned to write dialogue from my wife. Faye’s like Rich Little: she’s a great mimic. Even her first novel had superb dialogue. The thing with dialogue is it has to sound like people talking, but of course, it cannot because the way people really talk is boring, repetitive, circular and filled with uhms and ahs.

In addition to writing, I paint. Actually, it’s what I’m naturally better at doing. I realize that both painting and writing are forms of trickery. In painting, I’m simulating three dimensions using two. It’s the same with writing. It’s a form tromp of d’oeil.

Having a doctorate in psychology and practicing clinical psychology, what made you turn to writing fiction?

 I’ve been writing fiction since the age of nine. However, I never saw writing as a career. I was also attracted to science—and to music and art, which I continue to pursue. In college, I got a gig as an editorial cartoonist for the campus newspaper. That led to opportunities to write for the paper–columns, reviews, and straight reporting. I ended up as an editor, and essentially, had a dual identity: journalist and student of psychology. In my senior year, I won a literary prize and got an agent.

But that didn’t end my desire to become a child psychologist. While in grad school, I continued to write, publishing scientific articles, nonfiction, a short story, and my doctoral dissertation. At the same time, I was writing novels at night in my garage. Eventually, my first novel was published in 1985.

I loved being a child clinical psychologist and was reluctant to give up my practice. So, I continued to write and treat patients. I published five bestselling novels while in full-time practice, but eventually, working two jobs became untenable. In 1990, I became a full-time novelist.

But for five years, you had a dual identity: practicing psychology and writing fiction? What was that like?

It was rather manic. At that point, we had three kids and Faye and I were both writing. Thankfully, she’s Superwoman and handled so many things. I had three associates and we had a large practice in child psychology. I’d work all day seeing patients, then come home and spend time with my own kids, and at eleven in the evening, I’d go out to my office-garage and write for two hours. It’s the same routine I followed as a failed writer [Laughter]. Occasionally, if I had a cancellation, I’d sit down and work on my book. I was in my thirties and had lots of energy. I probably couldn’t do it today.

Do you ever miss your daily work as a psychologist?

At this point, I really don’t. I’m the kind of guy who loves something while I’m doing it, and then I’m able to move on. I loved helping kids and gave it up reluctantly. After leaving the practice, I did consulting and teaching, so I eased myself out of it.

As a psychologist, my time was strictly scheduled months in advance. As a writer, my time is very flexible and unstructured. I really enjoy the freedom I now have.

in Night Moves, a specific crime propels the novel, but the story also serves as a vehicle for commentary about life. Tell us about that.

I think that’s just naturally the way I see the world. Being a psychologist informs my writing.  For example, as someone who worked with children in oncology, an event like a terrible cancer diagnosis can become a catalyst for unlocking all kinds of other issues. That awareness colors my writing in the sense that a specific crime can open up a Pandora’s box of reactions and situations. Every crime impacts people, and trauma can bring out the best or worst in them, whether in a novel or in real life.

Night Moves has an extraordinary number of plot twists and developments. How do you construct a novel that’s both complex yet linear, so the reader easily follows the storyline?

That’s the major challenge in writing a novel. I think my academic training helps in that regard. I learned how to organize. I outline my novels by jotting down impressions, ideas and notes. Then, I progress to creating a general outline, and then a chapter-by-chapter outline.

I hold off on the actual writing until I have a sense of control over my material. Ironically, I rarely consult the outline and often find the finished book is quite different from what I had plotted.

However, the outline helps me structure things. It’s like an architect’s plans for designing a house. The writing itself becomes the interior decoration, and it’s the fun part. Then of course, there’s the rewrite, which refines and sculpts the manuscript to a finely-honed edge.

Alex Delaware had a difficult childhood. As psychologists, both he and you know the indelible effects of the past on current functioning. How does Alex’s past affect his present life?

Alex evolved as I got to know him better by writing books about him. When I wrote the first one, When the Bough Breaks, which was published in 1985, I never thought I’d get it published, let alone that it would become the first book in a successful series. I learned about Alex, along with my readers, and things began falling into place.

I parcel out his childhood and his personal history very judiciously. In some novels, he’s a protagonist; in others, he’s a consulting psychologist. Of course, his past has impacted his interest in psychology and his wanting to set certain things right.

I know you’ve been asked this question before, but how much of Jonathan Kellerman exists in Alex Delaware?

I think the author is in every character.

It took five years for an Alex Delaware novel to be published, and I realized I’d be best off writing about what I knew, which was clinical child psychiatry. So, there are career parallels. But, Alex is younger than I am; he’s thinner; more athletic; and much braver than I am. I’m a coward, which describes many crime writers. We write about things which frighten us.

I’m married with four kids; he’s single with no kids. He’s free to engage in high-risk behavior while I’m not. There’s a lot of me in him and in Milo, and in the bad guys, too. In a sense, all fiction is autobiography.

I know you’re a huge fan of Ross Macdonald. Will you talk about that?

It was serendipitous that I discovered him. One day as I was driving to Children’s Hospital, I passed a bookstore with a sign that read, ‘Books on Sale, Cheap.’ I went in, browsed around and found a book called The Underground Man by Ross Macdonald. I’d never read any of the hardboiled writers, but the flap copy was really interesting.

Reading the book blew me away. He was a brilliant writer who wrote about psychopathology in Southern California, and his books were beautifully written. I thought, ‘maybe I could do that.’

In fact, Ross Macdonald’s style informed my writing, When the Bough Breaks so much so, that my editor said, ‘This is really great but there’s a little too much Ross Macdonald here. Try to establish your own voice a little more.’ That’s what I’ve done.

If you could meet any two fictional characters from all of literature, who would they be?

I’d love to meet Edmond Dantes of The Count of Monte Cristo because he was so interesting. He evolved from the depths of despair to triumph. I’d also love to meet Watson from the Sherlock Holmes stories. I don’t think Sherlock would be very good company, but Watson was a doctor and highly intelligent. I think I could relate to him better than I could to Sherlock Holmes.

Will you complete this sentence: writing fiction has taught me__________________.

Writing fiction has taught me humility in the sense that I may think I know something about people, but they’re always unpredictable. And, I’m humbled by the realization that often occurs when I’m writing a novel and think I’ve done a good job, only to see the manuscript needs a ton more work to be done.

Congratulations on penning Night Moves, a tense, tightly woven novel that not only deals with crime, but as do all the Alex Delaware novels, addresses many compelling issues of contemporary life.

Mark Rubinstein is a novelist, physician and psychiatrist. His latest novel is Mad Dog Vengeance, a psychological suspense-thriller.

Please share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on Pinterest

Filed Under: About Books, Interviews Tagged With: crime, fear, fiction, psychology

A Trial is Really All About Storytelling-My Talk with Scott Turow

March 7, 2018 by Mark Rubinstein Leave a Comment

Scott Turow, the bestselling author of Presumed Innocent and other novels, graduated with high honors from Amherst College, receiving a fellowship to the Stanford University Creative Writing Center which he attended from 1970 to 1972. He then taught creative writing at Stanford. He entered Harvard Law School, graduating in 1978. For eight years, he was an Assistant United States Attorney in Chicago, serving as lead prosecutor in several high-visibility federal trials investigating corruption in the Illinois judiciary.

Today, he is a partner in an international law firm.

  Testimony features former prosecutor Bill ten Boom, who at the age of fifty, walks out on everything he thought was important to him: his law career, his wife, Kindle County, and even his country. When he’s tapped by the International Criminal Court—an organization charged with prosecuting crimes against humanity—he feels drawn to what will become the most elusive case of his career. Bill must sort through various suspects in prosecuting war crimes during the Bosnian War. And very little is as it first seems.

Testimony is a bit of a departure for you since it leaves Kindle County and deals with a European case of mass murder rather than a ‘smaller’ crime. How did the idea for the novel come to you?

It came slowly. It began when I went to the Hague, the diplomatic capital of the Netherlands and the international justice capital dealing with war crimes. I found myself talking with a group of eight men and women who said, ‘You’ve got to write a book about this place.’ They found the cases fascinating. There’s diplomatic infighting within the courtroom and the international setting is quite unusual. These elements sounded intriguing and I kept the idea in mind.

It found myself thinking seriously about it, because this was a venue for a novel that would give me a chance to explore something that’s always been of interest to me—namely, the Roma people. I’ve always been immensely curious about them, so I combined the law with my interest and imagination.

Though ‘Testimony’ deals with elements of international politics, it’s basically a crime novel and legal thriller. What about the courtroom makes it such a great venue for novels?

Courtrooms are inherently theatrical. Drama and conflict take place with two sides fiercely disagreeing with each other. By its very nature, something very important is at stake in a trial: in a civil case, it’s money; in a criminal matter, it’s almost always someone’s liberty. In a jury trial, you add another important element: the intricacies and arcana of the law must be made comprehensible to a popular audience. All these factors make the courtroom a wonderful setting either for novels or film. It’s all right there.

The law is replete with stories, isn’t it?

Absolutely, but the narrative element of the law was not as consciously apparent to me when I was in law school. I’d give Gerry Spence, the renowned trial lawyer who never lost a case, credit for demonstrating the crucial importance of the narrative element in presenting a case to a jury.

Whether he represented the defense or the prosecution, he was a genius at figuring out the storyline of every trial. He turned every case into a compelling story. The story is what a trial is really all about. If you don’t have a story to tell in the courtroom, you’ll be out of luck.

To some extent, is “Testimony” also a novel about your protagonist’s Bill ten Boom’s midlife crisis?

Yes, I don’t know how to hide from that question, Mark. [Laughter]. Bill has decided at the age of fifty that he’s not comfortable with his life. He throws over everything: he moves out of his home, divorces his wife, leaves his law firm, and then leaves the U.S. At fifty years of age, he’s decided to change everything.

It’s a bit about the road not travelled.

Absolutely. He’s not hostile to anyone, but he simply doesn’t feel good about where his life has taken him and decides to change nearly every aspect of it.

“Testimony” is an important and timely book because, among many other things, it explores the savagery of people who turn on their friends and neighbors. We see this now in Syria, Myanmar, and other places. Will you talk about that?

The International Criminal Court was started by member countries of the United Nations because of the sad recognition that war crimes and atrocities are never going to end. We can hope for a day when that deplorable behavior stops, but unfortunately, the historical track record suggests that civilization will chronically break down somewhere. It seems to happen again and again. The crime detailed in Testimony is emblematic of these crimes. The reality is that today’s technology has dramatically enhanced the killing power of maniacs all over the world.

You once said, ‘I’m a big believer in the fact that all authors really write only one book.’ What did you mean?

This comment is sometimes attributed to Hemingway or to Graham Greene. I admire both of them enormously. It turns out that most writers have a universal obsession they’re working out through their novels. In my case, I think it’s about the use and abuse of power and the notion of justice found in the law. I don’t use it as an excuse for repeating myself in my books. For twenty years, I avoided writing again about Rusty Sabich because I didn’t want to write the same book again. But thematically, there’s no doubt the same leitmotif runs through all my books.

We all have a ‘home’ for a reason. Most people enjoy having familiar signposts in their lives—places and things they can call their own and with which they can measure their own lives. That’s true imaginatively as well; and that’s why every author’s book tends to resemble the books they’ve already written.

You’re still a practicing attorney. How do you find the time to work in the law and write full-length novels?

Since 1991, I’ve been a part-time lawyer.  Initially, I was still trying lots of cases, but over the years, my caseload has diminished, and now my principle work is pro bono.

I’m on a quest to enhance the lives of and employment opportunities for people who’ve been released from prison and have been law-abiding for a long time.

What’s a typical day like for you?

Usually, by about ten o’clock in the morning, I’m in front of a computer, writing. I’ll sit for three to five hours a day and write. I don’t know of any author who writes for sixty minutes of each hour. I never have. I’m terribly distractible. My good friend, Richard Russo, says, ‘Every author experiences the temptation of finding his or her head inside the refrigerator and wondering what am I doing here? I’m not really hungry.’ [Laughter]. The reason is, of course, it’s the farthest point in the house from where the computer is. I use email to distract myself.

If I have to deal with something at the law firm, I do it. I’m perfectly capable of picking up the phone, talking at length to a client, then putting down the phone and going back to finish the sentence I was in the middle of writing. In the afternoon, I turn my attention to the more mundane things in life at the office.

Some people would say you invented the legal thriller.

Some people are kind enough to say that, but it’s probably an exaggeration if you think about The Merchant of Venice and the trial of Socrates. In terms of the contemporary approach of having a lawyer as a flawed protagonist, Presumed Innocent was the first novel to go down that pathway. I often think of the monk, Dom Perignon, who ‘invented’ champagne. He had no idea what he was doing when he drank this bottle of accidentally fermented wine. By legend, he fell down the stairs. [Laughter]. I sort of fell down the stairs.

But in a good way.

Yes, absolutely [More laughter].

If you could meet any two fictional characters in real life, who would they be?

I would love to meet Anna Karenina. She’s an amazingly brave and compelling woman. Among men, I’d like to meet George Smiley, though he’s pretty circumspect and I’m not sure I’d get much out of him. It might be really interesting to talk to Moses Herzog, Saul Bellow’s character.

What do you enjoy doing in your spare time?

My number one pursuit, aside from spending time with my wife, is spending time with our grandchildren. I have four grandchildren who all live elsewhere, so we spend a lot of time travelling. Everyone says the same thing about being a grandparent—it’s the one thing in life that lives up to its advanced billing. It’s very fulfilling.

I also play golf when I can.

Will you complete this sentence: Writing novels has taught me________________?

It’s taught me everything. It’s taught me about psychological process. I’ve learned that you can’t ever really escape from yourself, which goes back to the notion of a writer really writing only one book. But, no matter how stuck or frustrated a writer may be, inevitably, the obsession will take the writer to where he or she was meant to go. So, writing novels has taught me—or rather, has made me aware—of my own psychological processes.

What’s coming next from Scott Turow?

I’m writing a novel called The Last Trial. It’s about the final courtroom episode in the life of Sandy Stern, who’s made appearances in every novel I’ve written.

Congratulations on penning ‘Testimony,’ a riveting novel which, as the ‘New York Times’ said, is ‘a thriller, an exposition of international law and an exploration of an intensely serious and nasty episode in recent history.’ It held me in suspense right from the beginning.

Please share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on Pinterest

Filed Under: About Books, Interviews Tagged With: Best Sellers, fiction, legal thrillers, literature, trials, war crimes

Connect:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on GoodreadsFollow Us on Scribd

Recent Posts

  • Adrian McKinty Had Given Up On Writing: A Late Night Phone Call Changed Everything
  • David Morrell: Finding Inspiration, Transcending Genres, and Going the Distance
  • Don Winslow and the Making of a Drug War Epic
  • My talk with Lee Child about his “contract” with readers
  • C.J. Box on the Modern Western & Crime Thrillers

Archives

  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012

Categories

  • About Books
  • Aging
  • Awards
  • book launch
  • bookstores
  • courtroom drama
  • creativity
  • crime
  • doctor
  • Dog Tales
  • health
  • Huffington Post Column
  • Interviews
  • library
  • Love Gone Mad
  • Mark Rubinstein
  • medial thriller
  • novel
  • On Writing
  • Podcast
  • psychological thriller
  • Psychology Today Columns
  • Reviews
  • The Foot Soldier
  • thriller
  • Uncategorized
  • war

Copyright © 2015 Mark Rubinstein